suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IT31132 Status: Closed

DB2 OPTIMIZER INCORRECTLY RECOMMENDS AN INDEX AS PREREQUISITE FOR
ZIGZAG-JOIN

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / B50 - DB2
Problem description:
When running a query that qualifies for a zigzag join, it is
possible that the explain format information suggests to add
indexes in order to be able to run zigzag join as part of the
access plan even though an index might already fulfill this
request.

A message similar to the following will be put out:

Extended Diagnostic Information:
--------------------------------

Diagnostic Identifier: 1
Diagnostic Details: EXP0039I Query complexity measure. Highest
number
of joins in any query block: "6".
Diagnostic Identifier: 2
Diagnostic Details: EXP0256I Analysis of the query shows that
the
query might execute faster if an additional index
was created to enable zigzag join. Schema name:
"RUW_APP ". Table name: "TABLENAME". Column list:
"(COLUMN1, COLUMN2)".
Problem Summary:
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              *
* all                                                          *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         *
* See Error Description                                        *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              *
* Upgrade to Db2 11.5 m3 fp0 or later                          *
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Solution
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
BUG-Tracking
forerunner  : IT31125 
follow-up : 
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
03.12.2019
24.04.2020
24.04.2020
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)