Informix - Problem description
Problem IT14485 | Status: Closed |
ASSERT FAILURE AND CRASH POSSIBLE DURING CSM VP INITIALIZATION WHEN MULTIPLE CPU VPS ARE CONFIGURED | |
product: | |
INFORMIX SERVER / 5725A3900 / B70 - IDS 11.70 | |
Problem description: | |
An Assert Failure and crash may occur on instances configured with multiple CPU VPs when a number of simultaneous connection attempts are made on IDS ports that are enabled for CSS communications. The AF file includes: 16:46:50 Assert Failed: No Exception Handler 16:46:50 Who: Session(8508, informix@, 0, 0x25e418df8) Thread(8583, /opt/informix/lib/csm/libixspw.so, 25e3e3f28, 29) File: mtex.c Line: 490 16:46:50 Results: Exception Caught. Type: MT_EX_OS, Context: mem 16:46:50 Action: Please notify IBM Informix Technical Support. ... 16:46:50 Stack for thread: 8583 /opt/informix/lib/csm/libixspw.so base: 0x0000000261525000 len: 69632 pc: 0x0000000001309303 tos: 0x0000000001c15630 state: running vp: 29 (oninit) afstack (oninit) mt_ex_throw_sig (oninit) afsig_handler (Linux) (oninit) csmvp_dispatch (oninit) csmvp_thread (oninit) th_init_initgls (oninit) startup Note that this failure occurs on a CSM VP. | |
Problem Summary: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * Users using CSM for encrypted client communication with * * multiple CPU/CSM vp's * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * See Error Description * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Update to IBM Informix Server 11.70.xC9 * **************************************************************** | |
Local Fix: | |
Start instance with a single CPU VP and then add further CPU VPs using the onmode command. Note that only one CSM VP will be started in this scenario. | |
Solution | |
Workaround | |
not known / see Local fix | |
Timestamps | |
Date - problem reported : Date - problem closed : Date - last modified : | 25.03.2016 30.05.2017 30.05.2017 |
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) | |
11.70.xC9 | |
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) |