Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IT02052 Status: Closed

POOR PERFORMANCE WITH SUBSEQUENT UPDATES IN A SINGLE UOW WITH COLUMN
ORGANIZED TABLES

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A50 - DB2
Problem description:
Performing multiple Update commands on a table within a single 
UOW without doing a Commit causes slow performance on the 
subsequent Update commands with a Column Organized (BLU) table. 
For example, with a 40 million row test table the initial Update 
will perform as expected taking 0.07 seconds. When another 
Update is run before a Commit then this, and any subsequent 
Update commands, will be significantly slower taking nearly 0.5 
seconds. After running a Commit the next Update then performs as 
expected taking 0.07 seconds.
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* All Column Organized table users                             * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to DB2 LUW 10.5 Fix Pack 4                           * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
available fix packs:
DB2 Cancun Release 10.5.0.4 (also known as Fix Pack 4) for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.5 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Solution
Fixed in DB2 LUW 10.5 Fix Pack 4
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
27.05.2014
08.09.2014
08.09.2014
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
10.5.0.4 FixList