|
Problem IC62499
|
Status: Closed |
RAH SCRIPT USES TAIL +N WHICH CAUSES IT FAIL ON REDHAT LINUX AS TAIL + N IS NOT SUPPORTED. |
| product: |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2 |
| Problem description: |
Using db2iupdt in DPF environment to update an instance, part
of the error messages returned is
tail: cannot open `+1' for reading: No such file or directory
rah script rah +n in it which is not valid.
db2level
DB21085I Instance "db2inst2" uses "64" bits and DB2 code
release "SQL09070"
with level identifier "08010107".
Informational tokens are "DB2 v9.7.0.0", "special_22054",
"LINUXAMD6497_22054", and Fix Pack "0".
Product is installed at "/opt/ibm/db2/V9.7_01". |
| Problem Summary: |
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED: *
* DB2 9.7 *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: *
* RAH SCRIPT USES TAIL +N WHICH CAUSES IT FAIL ON REDHAT LINUX *
* AS TAIL + N IS NOT SUPPORTED. *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION: *
* Upgrade to 9.7 FP1 *
**************************************************************** |
| Local Fix: |
no local fix |
| available fix packs: |
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 1 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 3a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 4 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 7 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
|
| Solution |
Problem was first fixed in version 9.7 Fix Pack 1 |
| Workaround |
not known / see Local fix |
| Comment |
Fix Release 9.7 FP1 |
| Timestamps |
Date - problem reported :
Date - problem closed :
Date - last modified :
| 12.08.2009
17.02.2010
17.02.2010 |
| Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) |
9.7.FP1
|
| Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) |
| 9.7.0.1
|
 |
