|
Problem IC66077
|
Status: Closed |
MEMORY LEAK OF 36548 OR 514 BYTES WHEN EXECUTING LOAD COMMAND |
| product: |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2 |
| Problem description: |
When executing a load command, there is a memory leak of 514
bytes in the db2sysc process. If the load command is executed
via the sysproc.admin_cmd() procedure, then there is an
additional leak of 36034 bytes leaked in the db2fmp process that
executed the sysproc.admin_cmd() procedure. |
| Problem Summary: |
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED: *
* all users running load *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: *
* When executing a load command, there is a memory leak *
* of514bytes in the db2sysc process. If the load command *
* isexecutedvia the sysproc.admin_cmd() procedure, then there *
* is anadditional leak of 36034 bytes leaked in the db2fmp *
* processthatexecuted the sysproc.admin_cmd() procedure. *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION: *
* Upgrade to DB2 version 9.70.FP2 *
**************************************************************** |
| Local Fix: |
|
| available fix packs: |
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 3a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 4 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 7 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
|
| Solution |
Problem was first fixed in Version 9.7 Fix Pack 2 |
| Workaround |
not known / see Local fix |
| Timestamps |
Date - problem reported :
Date - problem closed :
Date - last modified :
| 05.02.2010
25.05.2010
22.04.2011 |
| Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) |
9.7.FP2,
9.70.FP2
|
| Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) |
| 9.7.0.2
|
 |
