Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IC71492 Status: Closed

STATIC EXECUTION INSERTS WRONG DATA IN DECFLOAT COLUMN USING PURE QUERY

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 950 - DB2
Problem description:
Using static execution (using pureQuery) insert into DECFLOAT 
column inserts wrong data. 
 
For example: 
create table table_1(id int, col1 DECFLOAT(16)) 
INSERT INTO TABLE_1 VALUES(?, ?) with 1, 100.00 as parameters 
 
 
Inserts 0, 100.00 instead of 1, 100.00. 
 
JCC JDBC driver trace does not show a problem on JCC client 
side. 
 
Dynamic execution (instead of static) works fine.
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* All                                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* Incorrect data is inserted for DecFloat column.              * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to Db2 LUW V9.5 fixpack7.                            * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Use Dynamic execution.
available fix packs:
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 7 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Solution
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
BUG-Tracking
forerunner  : APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: IC71497 IC71498 
follow-up : 
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
27.09.2010
12.10.2010
12.10.2010
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
9.5.
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
9.1.0.7 FixList
9.5.0.7 FixList