|
Problem IC76021
|
Status: Closed |
SOME 32-BIT DB2 REGISTRY KEYS ARE NOT SET DURING THE SILENT INSTALL OF 64-BIT IBM DATA SERVER DRIVER PACKAGE (DSDRIVER) |
| product: |
DB2 CONNECT / DB2CONNCT / 950 - DB2 |
| Problem description: |
When the 64-bit IBM Data Server Driver Package (DsDriver) is
installed via a response file based silent install, the
following 32-bit DB2 registry keys are not set in the 32-bit
registry hive
(1) DB2 Path Name, under:
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\IBM\DB2\InstalledCopies\<CopyName>\
Some 32-bit DB2 applications need this registry to work with
the 32-bit DB2 libraries installed with the 64-bit DB2 product.
(2) The OLEDB GUIDs, under:
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\IBM\DB2\InstalledCopies\<CopyName>\Ins
tallData\
These OLEDB GUIDs are needed in order to register the DB2 OLE DB
providers.
Thus, because those 32-bit DB2 registry keys are not set during
the silent 64-bit DsDriver install, some 32-bit DB2 applications
will not be able to work with the 64-bit DsDriver installed, and
the OLE DB provider will not be registered. |
| Problem Summary: |
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED: *
* WINDOWS *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: *
* See Problem Description above. *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION: *
* UPGRADE TO DB2 V9.5 FP 9 OR HIGHER *
* *
* OR *
* *
* USE TEMPORARY FIX *
**************************************************************** |
| Local Fix: |
Install the 64-bit DsDriver via a GUI install, instead of the
response file based silent install. |
| available fix packs: |
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
|
| Solution |
FIRST FIXED IN DB2 V9.5 FP 9 |
| Workaround |
Install the 64-bit DsDriver via a GUI install, instead of the
response file based silent install. |
| Timestamps |
Date - problem reported :
Date - problem closed :
Date - last modified :
| 26.04.2011
08.03.2012
08.03.2012 |
| Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) |
9.5.FP9
|
| Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) |
| 9.5.0.9
|
 |
