DB2 - Problem description
| Problem IC76491 | Status: Closed |
DB2BATCH RESULTSET OUTPUT RETURNS WRONG FRACTION PART FOR TIMESTAMP VALUES | |
| product: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 950 - DB2 | |
| Problem description: | |
DB2BATCH returns wrong fraction part for TIMESTAMP values.
Following steps will reproduce the issue:
create table t (testno INTEGER , testtime TIMESTAMP );
insert into t values ( 1 , '2011-04-01 00:00:01.000001' );
insert into t values ( 2 , '2011-04-01 00:00:01.000010' );
insert into t values ( 3 , '2011-04-01 00:00:01.000123' );
insert into t values ( 4 , '2011-04-01 00:00:01.001234' );
select * from t order by testtime asc ;
Output when running SELECT with db2 clp is correct:
TESTNO TESTTIME
----------- --------------------------
1 2011-04-01-00.00.01.000001
2 2011-04-01-00.00.01.000010
3 2011-04-01-00.00.01.000123
4 2011-04-01-00.00.01.001234
But running db2batch -d sample -f b.sql (contains "select * from
t order by testtime asc ;"):
* SQL Statement Number 1:
select * from t order by testtime asc ;
TESTNO TESTTIME
----------- --------------------------
1 2011-04-01 00:00:01.001000
2 2011-04-01 00:00:01.010000
3 2011-04-01 00:00:01.123000
4 2011-04-01 00:00:01.1234000 | |
| Problem Summary: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * All * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * See Problem Description above. * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Upgrade to DB2 Version 9.5 FixPack 9. * **************************************************************** | |
| Local Fix: | |
| available fix packs: | |
DB2 Version 9.5 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
| Solution | |
First fixed in Version 9.5 FixPack 9. | |
| Workaround | |
not known / see Local fix | |
| Timestamps | |
Date - problem reported : Date - problem closed : Date - last modified : | 19.05.2011 14.03.2012 14.03.2012 |
| Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.5.FP9 | |
| Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) | |
| 9.5.0.9 |
|