|
Problem IC84752
|
Status: Closed |
SECURITY: STACK BUFFER OVERFLOW VULNERABILITY IN JAVA STORED PROCEDURE INFRASTRUCTURE (CVE-2012-2197). |
| product: |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 950 - DB2 |
| Problem description: |
A stack buffer overflow vulnerability in Java Stored Procedure
infrastructure could be exploited to attain remote code
execution.
To exploit the vulnerability the malicious user would need:
1) Valid credential to connect to database
2) CONNECT privilege on database
3) A Java stored procedure to which the user has EXECUTE
privilege. |
| Problem Summary: |
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED: *
* All DB2 systems on all Linux, Unix and Windows platforms at *
* service levels from Version 9.5 GA through to Version 9.5 *
* Fix Pack 9. *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: *
* See Security Bulletin: Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in IBM *
* DB2 Java Stored Procedure Infrastructure *
* *
* (CVE-2012-2197). *
* http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21607628 *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION: *
* Refer to the following security bulletin to evaluate the *
* potential impact in your environment. *
* Security Bulletin: Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in IBM DB2 *
* SQL/PSM Stored Procedure Infrastructure (CVE-2012-4826). *
* http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21614536 *
**************************************************************** |
| Local Fix: |
|
| Solution |
An incomplete fix for this problem was introduced in DB2 Version
9.5 Fix Pack 10.
The fix for APAR IC86765 will complete the fix.
See Security Bulletin: Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in IBM DB2
SQL/PSM Stored Procedure Infrastructure (CVE-2012-4826).
http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21614536 |
| Workaround |
not known / see Local fix |
| Timestamps |
Date - problem reported :
Date - problem closed :
Date - last modified :
| 19.06.2012
21.08.2012
19.12.2012 |
| Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) |
9.5.FP10
|
| Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) |
