|
Problem IC89114
|
Status: Closed |
SQL0901N "ERROR LOADING TYPE PD (SQLRL_FTC_TYPEPD)" FOR EXPLICIT REBIND OF A PACKAGE IN DPF |
| product: |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2 |
| Problem description: |
In DPF environments, an explicit rebind of a package for a
stored procedure hits -901, if the procedure uses UDT and the
UDT was previously dropped.
The following is reported in the db2diag.log
2012-11-03-11.30.58.248415-240 I1330148E863 LEVEL: Severe
PID : 14392 TID : 46916985416000PROC :
db2sysc 1
INSTANCE: db2inst1 NODE : 001 DB : SAMPLE
APPHDL : 1-38882 APPID: *N1.db2inst1.121103153005
AUTHID : DB2INST1
EDUID : 939 EDUNAME: db2agent (CAPO) 1
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, relation data serv, sqlrr_dump_ffdc,
probe:300
DATA #1 : SQLCA, PD_DB2_TYPE_SQLCA, 136 bytes
sqlcaid : SQLCA sqlcabc: 136 sqlcode: -901 sqlerrml: 40
sqlerrmc: Error loading type pd (sqlrl_ftc_typepd)
sqlerrp : SQLNN0C9
sqlerrd : (1) 0x00000000 (2) 0x00000000 (3)
0x00000000
(4) 0x00000000 (5) 0xFFFFFF9C (6)
0x00000001
sqlwarn : (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
(7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
sqlstate:
The relevant stack file indicates that the error occurred in
sqlnnCheckNestedTypeInDPF. |
| Problem Summary: |
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED: *
* ALL *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: *
* See Error Description *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION: *
* Update to v9.7 Fixpack 10 *
**************************************************************** |
| Local Fix: |
Recreate the UDT and revalidate the corresponding routine during
next access or call sysproc.admin_revalidate_db_objects, instead
of rebinding the package. |
| Solution |
First fixed in v9.7 Fixpack 10 |
| Workaround |
not known / see Local fix |
| BUG-Tracking |
forerunner : APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: IC97839
follow-up : |
| Timestamps |
Date - problem reported :
Date - problem closed :
Date - last modified :
| 14.12.2012
11.08.2014
11.08.2014 |
| Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) |
9.7.FP10
|
| Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) |
| 9.7.0.10
|
 |
