DB2 - Problem description
| Problem IC96658 | Status: Closed | 
| DB2 OPTIMIZER MIGHT NOT CHOOSE A ONE-FETCH GROUP BY WHEN CARDINALITY IS UNDERESTIMATED | |
| product: | |
| DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A50 - DB2 | |
| Problem description: | |
| The optimizer will consider an optimization for an SQL statement 
containing a MIN or MAX aggregation without a group by clause, 
referred to as a one-fetch group by operation, if the stream is 
ordered on the aggregation source column. You can identify if 
the group by operation is optimized as a one-fetch by collecting 
an EXPLAIN of the statement and searching for the ONEFETCH 
argument in the group by operator details: 
 
                ONEFETCH: (One Fetch flag) 
                        TRUE 
 
If the input cardinality is significantly underestimated to 
value of 1 or less, then the optimizer might not choose to 
perform this optimization, and the ONEFETCH argument will not 
exist in the formatted EXPLAIN output. | |
| Problem Summary: | |
| **************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * ALL * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * See Error Problem Description above. * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Upgrade to DB2 Version V10.5 FP3. * **************************************************************** | |
| Local Fix: | |
| In most cases, collecting up-to-date statistics will improve the cardinality estimate if the SQL statement contains predicates that qualify the latest data in the table and the statistics are stale. | |
| available fix packs: | |
| DB2 Cancun Release 10.5.0.4 (also known as Fix Pack 4) for Linux, UNIX, and Windows | |
| Solution | |
| First fixed in DB2 Version V10.5FP3. | |
| Workaround | |
| not known / see Local fix | |
| Timestamps | |
| Date - problem reported : Date - problem closed : Date - last modified : | 07.10.2013 17.09.2014 17.09.2014 | 
| Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) | |
| Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) | |
| 10.5.0.4 |  | 







 
