home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Neueste VersionenFixList
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Haben Sie Probleme? - Kontaktieren Sie uns.
Kostenlos registrieren anmeldung-x26
Kontaktformular kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problembeschreibung

Problem IC75367 Status: Geschlossen

DB2START ADD DBPARTITIONNUM COMMAND WILL ALWAYS RETURN THE SAME ERROR
-6048, IF IT FAILS TO RETRIEVE DB CFG FROM CATALOG NODE.

Produkt:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2
Problembeschreibung:
On the DPF environment, performing the "db2start DBPARTITIONNUM 
<partition_num>  ADD DBPARTITIONNUM hostname <host_name> port 
<port#>" will always return -6048, if for any reason, it fails 
to get the db cfg from the catalog node. 
 
This defect fix will return the actual error why it failed to 
get the db cfg from the catalog node 
 
For example: 
On the DPF environment, if the database X was removed/dropped on 
the catalog node ONLY, then catalog-node's volume database 
directory (local) will NOT have the entry of this database X 
anymore. However this entry of database X still remains on other 
partitions/nodes. In addition, this database X still remains in 
the system database directory. 
 
If user perform ADD DBPARTITIONNUM, e.g. 
db2start DBPARTITIONNUM <partition_num> ADD DBPARTITIONNUM 
hostname <host_name> port <port#> 
 
then it will get the SQLCODE "-6048" (which is the communication 
error) message: 
 
03/10/2011 16:50:26     3   0   SQL1483N  Add database partition 
server  processing for database partition server "3" failed. 
Information returned for the error includes SQLCODE "-6048", 
SQLSTATE "    ", and message tokens "". 
 
SQL1483N  Add database partition server  processing for database 
partition server "3" failed. Information returned for the error 
includes SQLCODE "-6048", SQLSTATE "    ", and message tokens 
"".  SQLSTATE=5UA02 
 
Note that:  - ADD DBPARTITIONNUM picks up db entry from the 
system database directory. 
 
With this defect fix, it will return the following error 
instead: 
 
03/10/2011 16:50:26     3   0   SQL1483N  Add database partition 
server  processing for database partition server "3" failed. 
Information returned for the error includes SQLCODE "-1013", 
SQLSTATE "4270", and message tokens "". 
SQL1483N  Add database partition server  processing for database 
partition server "5" failed. Information returned for the error 
includes SQLCODE "-1013", SQLSTATE "4270", and message tokens 
"".  SQLSTATE=5UA02 
 
In this example it is failing with -1013, which is: 
 
SQL1013N  The database alias name or database name "<name>" 
could not be found.
Problem-Zusammenfassung:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* User with DPF environment.                                   * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* In some scenario the DBPARTITIONNUM used with db2start may   * 
* not return the correct error.                                * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Please upgrade to 9.7 FP5 or above.                          * 
****************************************************************
Local-Fix:
verfügbare FixPacks:
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 7 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Lösung
The problem is first fixed in DB2 Version 9.7 fix pack 5
Workaround
keiner bekannt / siehe Local-Fix
Weitere Daten
Datum - Problem gemeldet    :
Datum - Problem geschlossen :
Datum - der letzten Änderung:
29.03.2011
17.01.2012
02.05.2012
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos)
9.5.FP5,
9.7.FP5
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version
9.7.0.5 FixList