home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Neueste VersionenFixList
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Haben Sie Probleme? - Kontaktieren Sie uns.
Kostenlos registrieren anmeldung-x26
Kontaktformular kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problembeschreibung

Problem IC78343 Status: Geschlossen

QUERY WITH CORRELATION PREDICATE AND IN/EXISTS PREDICATE MAY RETURN
INCORRECT RESULT WHILE IT IS MATCHING TO MQT

Produkt:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2
Problembeschreibung:
A query may return incorrect result if all the following 
conditions are satisfied: 
 
1. Query has a SELECT subquery "SELECT <scalar_subquery> FROM 
<base_table_t>" 
2. <scalar_subquery> has a correlation predicate 
3. <scalar_subquery> also has an IN subquery predicate, or an 
EXISTS predicate. That predicate can be an OR predicate subterm. 
4. There exists an MQT <mqt_over_base_table_t> whose definition 
is "select <select_output_list> from <base_table_t> where 
<predicate>". 
 
For example, 
 
-- Base table 
create table t1(a int, b int, c int); 
create table t2(x int); 
 
-- MQT 
create table mqt1 as (select * from t1) data initially deferred 
refresh deferred; 
refresh table mqt1; 
 
-- Query 
SELECT (SELECT 1 FROM t1 AA WHERE AA.a = A.a AND (AA.b = 1 OR 
AA.c IN (SELECT x FROM t2))) 
FROM t1 A; 
 
the mapping of condition variables is: 
 
<scalar_subquery> = "(SELECT 1 FROM t1 AA WHERE AA.a = A.a AND 
(AA.b = 1 OR AA.c IN (SELECT x FROM t2)))" 
correlation predicate = "AA.a = A.a" 
IN subquery predicate = "AA.c IN (SELECT x FROM t2))" 
<base_table_t> = "t1" 
<mqt_over_base_table_t> = "mqt1" 
 
To verify if the problem is hit, generate db2exfmt plan file for 
the query. In that file, go to"Optimized Statement" section, and 
locate "= ANY (SELECT DISTINCT ". Check how many columns does 
"SELECT DISTINCT" include. If it has three columns, that is good 
and nothing else needs to be done. Otherwise, if it includes 
only one column, the problem might be hit. Now change query 
optimization level to 0 by issuing "db2 set current query 
optimization 0", and regenerate the db2exfmt plan against the 
same query, and check if "SELECT DISTINCT" contains three 
columns this time. If it does, then this problem is hit.
Problem-Zusammenfassung:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* ALL                                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* QUERY WITH CORRELATION PREDICATE AND IN/EXISTS PREDICATE MAY * 
* RETURN INCORRECT RESULT WHILE IT IS MATCHING TO MQT          * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to DB2 LUW Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5                    * 
****************************************************************
Local-Fix:
MQT matching should be blocked for that query. It can be done by 
any of following change. 
(1) db2 drop table <mqt_over_base_table_t>. 
(2) db2 set integrity for <mqt_over_base_table_t> off. 
(3) reduce optimization level to 0 or 1. 
(4) Append "WITH Rs" or "WITH RR" to query statement, assuming 
MQT is created at default isolation level CS.
verfügbare FixPacks:
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 7 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Lösung
Problem was first fixed in Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5
Workaround
keiner bekannt / siehe Local-Fix
Bug-Verfolgung
Vorgänger  : APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: IC78345 
Nachfolger : 
Weitere Daten
Datum - Problem gemeldet    :
Datum - Problem geschlossen :
Datum - der letzten Änderung:
26.08.2011
15.12.2011
15.12.2011
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos)
9.7.FP5
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version
9.7.0.5 FixList