Neueste VersionenFixList
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Haben Sie Probleme? - Kontaktieren Sie uns.
Kostenlos registrieren anmeldung-x26
Kontaktformular kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problembeschreibung

Problem IC84216 Status: Geschlossen

LIKE CLAUSES MIGHT RETURN INCORRECT RESULTS FOR COLUMNS WITH VARCHAR DATA
TYPE IN UNICODE DATABASES

Produkt:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A10 - DB2
Problembeschreibung:
In Unicode databases when clients with double-byte codepage are 
used, LIKE clauses might return incorrect results for columns 
defined as varchar data type. 
 
For example, you create a table t1 and then issue INSERT 
statements with values similar to the following statements: 
 
db2 "create table t1 (NAME varchar(10))" 
db2 "insert into t1 values ('a_abc')" 
db2 "insert into t1 values ('a_bc')" 
db2 "insert into t1 values ('a__c')" 
db2 "insert into t1 values ('a2bc')" 
db2 "insert into t1 values ('aabc')" 
db2 "insert into t1 values ('abc')" 
 
Then you run the following queries: 
db2 "select * from t1 where NAME LIKE '%a__'"    <<-- SQL #1 
db2 "select * from t1 where NAME LIKE '%a__a%'"  <<-- SQL #2 
db2 "select * from t1 where NAME LIKE '%a__b%'"  <<-- SQL #3 
 
The number of rows that you receive from the above queries is: 5 
:  1 :  1, which is incorrect. The correct number of rows is: 6 
:  1 :  4 and is returned by the above queries when the column 
NAME is defined as char data type. 
 
Note: In the above statements and queries, '__' represents one 
double-byte underscore character and '_' represents one 
single-byte underscore character.
Problem-Zusammenfassung:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* DB2 UDB Version 10.1                                         * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to Version 10.1 FixPack 1.                           * 
****************************************************************
Local-Fix:
verfügbare FixPacks:
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 1 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 4 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 3a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Lösung
Problem was first fixed in DB2 UDB Version 10.1 FixPack 1.
Workaround
keiner bekannt / siehe Local-Fix
Weitere Daten
Datum - Problem gemeldet    :
Datum - Problem geschlossen :
Datum - der letzten Änderung:
13.06.2012
13.11.2012
13.11.2012
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos)
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version
10.1.0.1 FixList
10.5.0.1 FixList