Neueste VersionenFixList
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Haben Sie Probleme? - Kontaktieren Sie uns.
Kostenlos registrieren anmeldung-x26
Kontaktformular kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problembeschreibung

Problem IC84453 Status: Geschlossen

EXTENT RECLAIM ON MDC TABLES MAY RETURN SQL0984C AND CAUSE THE INSTANCE
CRASH.

Produkt:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A10 - DB2
Problembeschreibung:
SQL0984C may occur when doing extent reclaim on MDC tables, such 
as: 
 
CALL SYSPROC.ADMIN_MOVE_TABLE('SCHEMA', 'TABLENAME', '', '', '', 
'', '', '', '', '', 'MOVE'); 
 
This may result in: 
 
SQL0984C  COMMIT or ROLLBACK was not successful. Subsequent SQL 
statements cannot be processed. 
 
The database then undergoes crash recovery. 
 
The following conditions must be met for the problem to occur: 
 
1) Extent reclaim (e.g. reorg, admin_move_table) of an MDC 
table. 
2) The table must be located in an old-type DMS tablespace, i.e. 
a DMS table space created before 9.7 and migrated to 9.7 
 
From db2diag.log, the error starts like this: 
2011-10-14-09.35.30.079025-660 I3934177A503       LEVEL: Error 
PID     : 475282               TID  : 13610       PROC : db2sysc 
0 
INSTANCE: db2inst1               NODE : 000         DB   : 
sample 
APPHDL  : 0-62052              APPID: *LOCAL.testdb.111013203449 
AUTHID  : testdb 
EDUID   : 13610                EDUNAME: db2agent (FDB) 0 
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, buffer pool services, sqlbDMSMapObj2Pool, 
probe:840 
MESSAGE : ZRC=0x8402001B=-2080243685=SQLB_EMP_MAP_INFO_NOT_FOUND 
          "EMP MAP INFO NOT FOUND" 
 
2011-10-14-09.35.30.079198-660 I3934681A551       LEVEL: Error 
PID     : 475282               TID  : 13610       PROC : db2sysc 
0 
INSTANCE: db2inst1               NODE : 000         DB   : 
sample 
APPHDL  : 0-62052              APPID: *LOCAL.testdb.111013203449 
AUTHID  : testdb 
EDUID   : 13610                EDUNAME: db2agent (FDB) 0 
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, buffer pool services, sqlbDMSMapObj2Pool, 
probe:840 
DATA #1 : String, 119 bytes 
 Obj={pool:34;obj:1963;type:0} State=x37 Parent={34;1963}, 
EM=125038, PP0=125040 Page=1 Cont=0 Offset=125040 BlkSize=3 
 
The top stack trace: 
 
MarkDBBad 
sqldmpnd 
sqlptppl 
sqlptppl 
sqlpxcm1 
sqlrrcom_dps 
sqlrrcom 
sqlrr_commit
Problem-Zusammenfassung:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to DB2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows 10.1 Fix Pack 1  * 
****************************************************************
Local-Fix:
1. Avoid extent reclaim such as  "reorg table <tablename> 
reclaim extents only allow write access" 
OR 
2. db2set DB2_HASH_PURGE_THRESH=0 
A side effect is a potentially slower performance when dropping 
small tables, accompanied with a possible latch 
contention. However, if small tables are not being dropped 
frequently, this workaround will be acceptable. Setting 
DB2_HASH_PURGE_THRESH=0 reverts the performance of dropping 
small tables to the same level as pre-9.7 releases.
verfügbare FixPacks:
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 1 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 3 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 4 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 3a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 10.1 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Lösung
Problem first fixed in DB2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows 10.1 Fix 
Pack 1
Workaround
keiner bekannt / siehe Local-Fix
Weitere Daten
Datum - Problem gemeldet    :
Datum - Problem geschlossen :
Datum - der letzten Änderung:
14.06.2012
01.11.2012
01.11.2012
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos)
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version
10.1.0.1 FixList
10.5.0.1 FixList