DB2 - Problembeschreibung
Problem IC99164 | Status: Geschlossen |
USING LOAD FOR MDC TABLES ON CASE INSENSITIVE DATABASES MIGHT CAUSE BLOCK INDEX CORRUPTION | |
Produkt: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2 | |
Problembeschreibung: | |
When the MDC table is populated with LOAD utility, the LOAD puts upper-case key values in the same index block of as lower-case key values.This happens in case insensitive database. Following scenario leads to the problem: db2 "create db wsdb collate using UCA500R1_LEN_AN_CX_EX_FX_HX_NX_S2" db2 "connect to wsdb" db2 "create tablespace ts1 extentsize 2" db2 "create table t1 (i1 int, c2 char(1), i3 int, c4 char(250)) organize by (i1,c2) in ts1" echo "1,Y,1,SpaceWaster" >> dataFile echo "1,y,2,SpaceWaster" >> dataFile db2 "load from dataFile of del messages /dev/null insert into t1" db2 "create table t2 (i1 int) in ts1" db2 "insert into t2 values (1)" Next, during DELETE(UPDATE) operation on the MDC table following error might be returned: db2 "delete from t1 where c4 = 'SpaceWaster' and i1 in (select i1 from t2)" DB21034E The command was processed as an SQL statement because it was not a valid Command Line Processor command. During SQL processing it returned: SQL0901N The SQL statement failed because of a non-severe system error. Subsequent SQL statements can be processed. (Reason "Key data mismatch encountered during key delete".) SQLSTATE=58004 The error occurs when the block index you are trying to DELETE(UPDATE) from has the key stored with a lower-case instead of an upper-case, and we are trying to update the block index using an upper-case key value instead of a lower-case key value. Once you hit the issue, following entries are logged in db2diag.log 2014-02-05-06.22.11.206277-300 I26837E538 LEVEL: Severe PID : 624 TID : 46912946301248PROC : db2sysc INSTANCE: bastarma NODE : 000 DB : WSDB APPHDL : 0-89 APPID: *LOCAL.bastarma.140205110041 AUTHID : BASTARMA EDUID : 16 EDUNAME: db2agent (WSDB) FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, index manager, sqlischd, probe:973 RETCODE : ZRC=0x8709002C=-2029453268=SQLI_NOKEY "Key not found within node" DIA8541C The index key could not be found, the value was "". 2014-02-05-06.22.11.572715-300 I35084E537 LEVEL: Severe PID : 624 TID : 46912946301248PROC : db2sysc INSTANCE: bastarma NODE : 000 DB : WSDB APPHDL : 0-89 APPID: *LOCAL.bastarma.140205110041 AUTHID : BASTARMA EDUID : 16 EDUNAME: db2agent (WSDB) FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, index manager, sqlischd, probe:99 RETCODE : ZRC=0x8709002C=-2029453268=SQLI_NOKEY "Key not found within node" DIA8541C The index key could not be found, the value was "". 2014-02-05-06.22.11.572830-300 I35622E502 LEVEL: Severe PID : 624 TID : 46912946301248PROC : db2sysc INSTANCE: bastarma NODE : 000 DB : WSDB APPHDL : 0-89 APPID: *LOCAL.bastarma.140205110041 AUTHID : BASTARMA EDUID : 16 EDUNAME: db2agent (WSDB) FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, index manager, sqlischd, probe:99 MESSAGE : Index object = {TBSPACEID=<3>; OBJECTID=<4>} Parent object = {TBSPACEID=<3>; OBJECTID=<4>} Further FODC_IndexError is executed, and the trap file contain stack with following functions (limited to meaningful part of the stack): ... pthread_kill sqloDumpEDU sqlischdDumpData sqlischd sqlidelk sqldKeyDelete sqldRowDelete sqlridel sqlriExecThread sqlrievl sqlriSectInvoke ... | |
Problem-Zusammenfassung: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * ALL * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * See Error Description * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Upgrade to DB2 version 9.7 fixpack 10 * **************************************************************** | |
Local-Fix: | |
To avoid hitting the problem, the workaround is to normalize any character data in the dimension columns for any MDC tables, or to use import instead of load. If you have already hit the problem, then then you need to recreate your MDC table to fix the problem. | |
Lösung | |
Problem was first fixed in DB2 version 9.7 fixpack 10 | |
Workaround | |
keiner bekannt / siehe Local-Fix | |
Bug-Verfolgung | |
Vorgänger : APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: IC99374 IC99377 Nachfolger : | |
Weitere Daten | |
Datum - Problem gemeldet : Datum - Problem geschlossen : Datum - der letzten Änderung: | 05.02.2014 10.11.2014 10.11.2014 |
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.7.FP10 | |
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version | |
9.7.0.10 |