home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Neueste VersionenFixList
15.0.xC1.2 FixList
14.10.xC13.3 FixList
12.10.xC16.X5 FixList
11.70.xC9.XB FixList
11.50.xC9.X2 FixList
11.10.xC3.W5 FixList
Haben Sie Probleme? - Kontaktieren Sie uns.
Kostenlos registrieren anmeldung-x26
Kontaktformular kontakt-x26

Informix - Problembeschreibung

Problem IT02015 Status: Geschlossen

CREATING MULTIPLE ATTACHED INDEXES ON SAME FIELD WITH ASC/DESC
DIFFERENTIATOR RETURNS ERROR 350/108

Produkt:
INFORMIX SERVER / 5725A3900 / C10 - IDS 12.10
Problembeschreibung:
Creating an attached index when there is already one existing on 
the same column but with a differentiator of asc or desc will 
return error 350/108. 
 
Example: 
 
  create index i1 on t (i asc) in table; 
  create index i2 on t (i desc) in table;  <-- error 350 / 108 
returned
Problem-Zusammenfassung:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* IDS11.70 and IDS12.10 users using attached indexes           * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Update to IDS-12.10.xC5                                      * 
****************************************************************
Local-Fix:
If "in table" is replaced by "in <dbspace>" for index i2, it 
does work as well as if both "in table" statements are removed, 
making both indexes detached. 
 
Another workaround is to add a filler in declaration of index 
i2: 
 
  create index i1 on t (i asc) in table; 
  create index i2 on t (i desc, filler) in table;
Lösung
Problem Fixed In IDS-12.10.xC5
Workaround
keiner bekannt / siehe Local-Fix
Weitere Daten
Datum - Problem gemeldet    :
Datum - Problem geschlossen :
Datum - der letzten Änderung:
23.05.2014
16.10.2015
16.10.2015
Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos)
Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version
11.70.xC8.W1 FixList
12.10.xC4.W1 FixList
12.10.xC5 FixList
12.10.xC5.W1 FixList