DB2 - Problembeschreibung
| Problem IT07580 | Status: Geschlossen |
INCREASED DB2 PRIVATE MEMORY USAGE ON 10.5 FIX PACK 4 WHEN RUNNING TRUSTED UDFs OR STORED PROCEDURES | |
| Produkt: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A50 - DB2 | |
| Problembeschreibung: | |
In Version 10.5 Fix pack 4, the memory usage related to the
execution of trusted routines increased significantly. Up to an
additional 9MB may be cached per agent/subagent when executing a
combination of trusted routines (C, SQL). Environments with
persistent connections and configurations with subagent pooling
(DPF and intra_parallelism) are more vulnerable as the memory
usage is cached until the agent/subagent processes an
application/connection termination. If DB2's private memory
usage increases significantly after upgrading to Version 10.5
Fix Pack 4, and connections regularly execute trusted routines,
this APAR is a likely cause.
private memory usage can be monitored via the MON_GET_MEMORY_SET
and MON_GET_MEMORY_POOL routines (values are in KB units), for
example :
db2 select MEMORY_POOL_TYPE, MEMORY_POOL_USED from
table"(MON_GET_MEMORY_POOL('PRIVATE',null,null))" order by
MEMORY_POOL_USED desc
db2 select MEMORY_SET_TYPE, MEMORY_SET_USED from
table"(MON_GET_MEMORY_SET('PRIVATE',null,null))" | |
| Problem-Zusammenfassung: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * Systems running DB2 Version 10.5 Fix Packs 4,5, and 6 are * * vulnerable * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * See Error Description * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Upgrade to DB2 Version 10.5 Fix Pack 7 * **************************************************************** | |
| Local-Fix: | |
| Lösung | |
Problem first fixed in DB2 Version 10.5 Fix Pack 7 | |
| Workaround | |
keiner bekannt / siehe Local-Fix | |
| Weitere Daten | |
Datum - Problem gemeldet : Datum - Problem geschlossen : Datum - der letzten Änderung: | 09.03.2015 16.02.2016 16.02.2016 |
| Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos) | |
| Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version | |
| 10.5.0.7 |
|