home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IC78934 Status: Closed

AN UPDATE OR INSERT QUERY WITH LARGE OBJECT HOST VARIABLE ON DPF FAILS WITH
SQL0901.

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2
Problem description:
An sql0901 error might occur if the following conditions are 
true: 
- A DPF environment 
- An insert or update query that tries to insert/update a column 
with a large type (longvarchar/lob/blob/clob) where a host 
variable is used 
- the query is enabled with the REOPT feature (either reopt 
always or reopt once) 
- A failure of some kind happens (for example, an sql0911 
deadlock or some other such failure that causes a rollback) with 
a very specific timing window shortly after the query is 
invoked. 
- the query is invoked again in the future (this will give the 
-901) 
 
When this problem was discovered, it was noted that using the 
concurrency control features of WLM (work load manager) might 
increase the chances of hitting the problem because it may 
expose the problematic timing window for slightly longer. 
 
In the db2diag.log, the details of the sql0901 are as follows: 
 
2011-08-26-17.00.30.867857+330 I959480630A849     LEVEL: Severe 
PID     : 3080510              TID  : 16481       PROC : db2sysc 
1 
INSTANCE: svtreg1              NODE : 001         DB   : WLM 
APPHDL  : 0-8801               APPID: *N0.svtreg1.110827040034 
AUTHID  : SVTREG1 
EDUID   : 16481                EDUNAME: db2agntp (WLM) 1 
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, relation data serv, sqlrr_dump_ffdc, 
probe:300 
DATA #1 : SQLCA, PD_DB2_TYPE_SQLCA, 136 bytes 
 sqlcaid : SQLCA     sqlcabc: 136   sqlcode: -901   sqlerrml: 33 
 sqlerrmc: sqlrkchvRemote: No entry found #2 
 sqlerrp : SQLRR093 
 sqlerrd : (1) 0x00000000      (2) 0x00000000      (3) 
0x00000000 
           (4) 0x00000000      (5) 0xFFFFFF6A      (6) 
0x00000001 
 sqlwarn : (1)      (2)      (3)      (4)        (5)       (6) 
           (7)      (8)      (9)      (10)        (11) 
 sqlstate: 
 
In addition, the sql0901 error will produce a stack traceback 
file showing the following functions on the stack: 
 
sqlzeSqlCode + 0x378 
sqlrrSqlCode + 0x2C8 
sqlrkchvRemoteFetch + 0x480 
sqlrimso + 0x19E8 
sqldmadx + 0x5E0 
sqldFormatLobLongCol + 0xD94 
sqldFullFormatFixedVar + 0x1310 
sqldFullFormat + 0x7C 
sqldRowUpdate + 0xC1C 
sqlriupd + 0x87C 
 
As a result of the -901, the query will get rolled back.
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* All dpf                                                      * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* AN UPDATE OR INSERT QUERY WITH LARGE OBJECT HOST VARIABLE ON * 
* DPF                                                          * 
* FAILS WITH SQL0901.                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* apply FP5 to get this fix                                    * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
available fix packs:
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 5 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 6 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 7 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 8 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 9a for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 10 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows

Solution
AN UPDATE OR INSERT QUERY WITH LARGE OBJECT HOST VARIABLE ON DPF 
FAILS WITH SQL0901.
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
27.09.2011
17.01.2012
17.01.2012
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
9.7.0.5 FixList