Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IT04236 Status: Closed

SQL STATEMENT WITH REPARTITIONED JOINS MIGHT RETURN INCORRECT RESULTS IN A
DPF SYSTEM

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A10 - DB2
Problem description:
A complex SQL statement, requiring repartitioned joins in a DPF 
system, might produce wrong results if the following conditions 
are met: 
 
- The SQL statement includes two or more joins that are not 
collocated 
- At least one of the joins chosen by the optimizer is a 
repartitioned join, identifiable by the presence of a TQ 
operator somewhere below both inputs to the join 
- The join columns are of short-string type (CHAR, VARCHAR) with 
differing lengths. 
 
Note that the presence of these conditions does not always lead 
to incorrect results.
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* Database partitioning feature                                * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to DB2 version 10.1.0.5.                             * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
You can attempt to avoid the repartition join by creating one or 
more materialized query tables (MQT) on each table referenced in 
the join, where the MQT is defined with a hash distribution key 
on the join columns.
Solution
The problem was first fixed in DB2 version 10.1.0.5.
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
05.09.2014
10.07.2015
10.07.2015
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
10.1.0.5 FixList