Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IT10651 Status: Closed

RDC: PERF: THROUGHPUT VERY LOW (98% DEGRADED) WHEN DIAGLEVEL IS 4

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2
Problem description:
Setting dbm cfg param diaglevel to 4 is expected to have worse 
performance than diaglevel 3, but the performance in v98fp3 
diaglevel 4 resembles that of an nbuild and is very very low. 
 
There is a message that is dumped to db2diag.log very 
frequently: 
 
2010-10-26-15.53.24.315615-240 I3145388E547          LEVEL: Info 
PID     : 25191                TID  : 46916826032448 PROC : 
db2sysc 
INSTANCE: aaa                  NODE : 000          DB   : DTW 
APPHDL  : 0-69                 APPID: *LOCAL.aaa.101026195321 
AUTHID  : AAA 
EDUID   : 80                   EDUNAME: db2agent (AAA) 
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, trace services, sqlt_logerr_data (secondary 
logging function), probe:50 
MESSAGE : DEBUG: javaDebug init 
DATA #1 : Hexdump, 1 bytes 
0x00002AABACBEF1FB : 00 
 
 
I created a gbuild which comments out this line in 
/vbs/engn/sqri/sqlriudf.C : 
 
                sqlt_logerr_data("DEBUG: javaDebug init", 
                                 &fmpParms.javaDebug, 
                                 sizeof(fmpParms.javaDebug), 
                                 SQLT_FFSL_INF); 
 
 
The performance of my gbuild in diaglevel 4 is very close to our 
nightly runs which run at diaglevel 3. So vanilla s101021 had a 
TPS of 27.59 (run number lnx05_7741) as opposed to my gbuild's 
TPS of 2338.2 (run number lnx05_7739) 
 
 
Is this message important to be dumped to db2diag.log or can it 
be logged less frequently or removed altogether?
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* NA                                                           * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Change diaglevel to 3                                        * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Change diaglevel to 3
Solution
NA
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
12.08.2015
05.11.2015
05.11.2015
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
9.7.0.11 FixList