Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IT04474 Status: Closed

"LIMIT # OFFSET #" MAY RETURN MORE ROWS THAN EXPECTED WHEN
QUERIES CONTAIN UNION OR UNION ALL OPERATORS.

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A10 - DB2
Problem description:
Queries containing UNION or UNION ALL operators with "LIMIT # 
OFFSET #" clause does not behave the same way as FETCH FIRST N 
ROWS ONLY. As such, under these conditions, it may return more 
rows than expected. 
 
Consider a query using the "FETCH FIRST 1 ROW ONLY" clause : 
> select 1 C1 from sysibm.sysdummy1 
  union all 
   select 2 C1 from sysibm.sysdummy1 
   ORDER BY C1 ASC 
   FETCH FIRST 1 ROWS ONLY 
 
Which returns: 
C1 
 
          1 
 
  1 record(s) selected. 
 
 
Using the same data with a "LIMIT 1 OFFSET 0" clause to mimic 
the "FETCH FIRST 1 ROWS ONLY" 
> select 1 C1 from sysibm.sysdummy1 
   union all 
   select 2 C1 from sysibm.sysdummy1 
   ORDER BY C1 ASC 
   LIMIT 1 OFFSET 0 
 
We get more rows than expected if this is used in conjunction 
with UNION or UNION ALL: 
 
C1 
 
          1 
          2 
 
  2 record(s) selected. 
 
> select 1 C1 from sysibm.sysdummy1 
   union all 
   select 2 C1 from sysibm.sysdummy1 
   ORDER BY C1 ASC 
   LIMIT 1 OFFSET 1 
 
C1 
 
          1 
          2 
 
  2 record(s) selected. 
 
 
The problem can be circumvented as follows : 
 
> select * from 
     ( select 1 C1 from sysibm.sysdummy1 
       union all 
       select 2 C1 from sysibm.sysdummy1 
       ORDER BY C1 ASC ) 
    LIMIT 1 OFFSET 0 
 
C1 
 
          1 
 
  1 record(s) selected.
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* all                                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to version 10.1 Fix Pack 5                           * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Solution
First fixed in version 10.1 Fix Pack 5
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
18.09.2014
16.07.2015
16.07.2015
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
10.1.0.5 FixList