|
Problem IT20166
|
Status: Geschlossen |
SHARED LOCK HELD ON "BLD REF ###" WHEN DDL INSERT ON TABLE WITH REFERENTIAL CONSTRAINT WAITS ON LOCK HELD BY PARENT TABLE
|
| Produkt: |
INFORMIX SERVER / 5725A3900 / C10 - IDS 12.10 |
| Problembeschreibung: |
When the problem occurs, you will see a "bld ref" mutex being
held with an owner 0 and a waiter
with an ever increasing waittime comparable to:
:$ onstat -g lmx
IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 12.10.FC8W1 -- On-Line
-- Up 00:15:43 -- 1263824 Kbytes
Locked mutexes:
mid addr name holder lkcnt
waiter waittime
3585 47bb6f40 bld ref 10 0 1
86 710
The waiter will likely have a stack something like this, but
there are other variations showing a
thread waiting on a "bld ref" mutex:
Stack for thread: 86 sqlexec
base: 0x0000000049447000
len: 266240
pc: 0x00000000013f51d6
tos: 0x0000000049486270
state: mutex wait
vp: 8
(oninit) yield_processor_mvp
(oninit) mt_lock_wait
(oninit) mt_lock_helper
(oninit) getrefmutex
(oninit) blddicref
(oninit) bldrefsx
(oninit) maybe_bldrefs
(oninit) bldstructs
(oninit) sqcmd
(oninit) sq_cmnd
(oninit) sq_prepare
(oninit) sqmain
(oninit) spawn_thread
(oninit) th_init_initgls
(oninit) startup
An onstat -g ath will look something like this for the thread
with the lock held on parent table (84), the thread holding the
share lock
on the "bld ref" mutex while waiting on the lock release (85)
and any other thread that is waiting on the "bld ref" mutex:
Threads:
tid tcb rstcb prty status
vp-class name
84 493f4958 47075d40 1 cond wait
netnorm 8cpu sqlexec
85 49367d10 47076618 1 yield
lockwait 8cpu sqlexec
86 492d6568 47074b90 1 mutex wait
bld ref 10 8cpu sqlexec |
| Problem-Zusammenfassung: |
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED: *
* Users of IDS prior to 12.10.xC9 and 11.70.xC10 *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: *
* When the problem occurs, you will see a "bld ref" mutex *
* being *
* held with an owner 0 and a waiter *
* with an ever increasing waittime comparable to: *
* *
* :$ onstat -g lmx *
* *
* IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 12.10.FC8W1 -- *
* On-Line *
* -- Up 00:15:43 -- 1263824 Kbytes *
* *
* Locked mutexes: *
* mid addr name holder *
* lkcnt *
* waiter waittime *
* 3585 47bb6f40 bld ref 10 0 1 *
* 86 710 *
* *
* The waiter will likely have a stack something like this, but *
* there are other variations showing a *
* thread waiting on a "bld ref" mutex: *
* *
* Stack for thread: 86 sqlexec *
* base: 0x0000000049447000 *
* len: 266240 *
* pc: 0x00000000013f51d6 *
* tos: 0x0000000049486270 *
* state: mutex wait *
* vp: 8 *
* *
* (oninit) yield_processor_mvp *
* (oninit) mt_lock_wait *
* (oninit) mt_lock_helper *
* (oninit) getrefmutex *
* (oninit) blddicref *
* (oninit) bldrefsx *
* (oninit) maybe_bldrefs *
* (oninit) bldstructs *
* (oninit) sqcmd *
* (oninit) sq_cmnd *
* (oninit) sq_prepare *
* (oninit) sqmain *
* (oninit) spawn_thread *
* (oninit) th_init_initgls *
* (oninit) startup *
* *
* An onstat -g ath will look something like this for the *
* thread *
* with the lock held on parent table (84), the thread holding *
* the *
* share lock *
* on the "bld ref" mutex while waiting on the lock release *
* (85) *
* and any other thread that is waiting on the "bld ref" mutex: *
* *
* Threads: *
* tid tcb rstcb prty status *
* vp-class name *
* *
* 84 493f4958 47075d40 1 cond *
* wait *
* netnorm 8cpu sqlexec *
* 85 49367d10 47076618 1 yield *
* lockwait 8cpu sqlexec *
* 86 492d6568 47074b90 1 mutex *
* wait *
* bld ref 10 8cpu sqlexec *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION: *
* Fixed in IDS 12.10.xC9+ and 11.70.xC10 if and when it *
* becomes available. If this fix is required, contact *
* Informix Technical Support. *
**************************************************************** |
| Local-Fix: |
|
| Lösung |
|
| Workaround |
keiner bekannt / siehe Local-Fix |
| Weitere Daten |
Datum - Problem gemeldet :
Datum - Problem geschlossen :
Datum - der letzten Änderung:
| 11.04.2017
04.11.2019
31.08.2020 |
| Problem behoben ab folgender Versionen (IBM BugInfos) |
11.70.0,
11.70.xC10,
12.10.xC9
|
| Problem behoben lt. FixList in der Version |
