suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
11.1.0.7 FixList
10.5.0.9 FixList
10.1.0.6 FixList
9.8.0.5 FixList
9.7.0.11 FixList
9.5.0.10 FixList
9.1.0.12 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

DB2 - Problem description

Problem IT16882 Status: Closed

DB2 BLU QUERY CAN END UP WITH WRONG JOIN ORDER SO THAT HASH JOINIS BUILDING
ON LARGE TABLE

product:
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / A50 - DB2
Problem description:
A BLU query can be optimized with a suboptimal plan so that the 
hash join order is flipped and the hash is building on a very 
large intermediate table. 
 
This is a very specific case caused by an Effectively Cartesian 
join of the fact table in the query. This can be seen in explain 
with filter factor = 1, i.e.: 
 
		60) Predicate used in Join, 
			Comparison Operator: 		Equal (=) 
			Subquery Input Required: 	No 
			Filter Factor: 			1 
 
The query may eventually fail with SQL0955 due to out of 
SORTHEAP memory. 
A better plan which avoids this problem is picked up with 
optimization level 9. This should already happen with default 
optimization level 5.
Problem Summary:
**************************************************************** 
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              * 
* ALL                                                          * 
**************************************************************** 
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         * 
* See Error Description                                        * 
**************************************************************** 
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              * 
* Upgrade to Db2 10.5 Fix Pack 9 or higher                     * 
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Use optimization level 9
Solution
First fixed in Db2 10.5 Fix Pack 9
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
02.09.2016
29.09.2017
29.09.2017
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
9.0.
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)