DB2 - Problem description
Problem IT31054 | Status: Closed |
EVEN IF RESERVE_POLICY IS RECOMMENDED TO NO_RESERVE, DB2PREREQCHECK -TB_DEV NOT SUCCEED WITH "WARNING: REQUIREMENT NOT MATCHING" | |
product: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / B50 - DB2 | |
Problem description: | |
The "single_path" and "PR_exclusive" are checked as SCSI type, and db2prereqcheck command logged "The value of rc is :-1 Invalid SCSI type configuration of the disk on the host", after "no_reserve" is set in reserve_policy even though it is recommended as below. * Shared storage disk settings for Category 1 Storage Devices https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSEPGG_11.5.0/com .ibm.db2.luw.qb.server.doc/doc/c0070187.html Before creating a pureScale instance, it is recommended that the disk RSCT peer domain attribute, reserve_policy, be set to no_reserve. This recommendation applies to all supported shared storage devices, device drivers, and disk types. Once db2icrt is finished running and the Db2 pureScale instance is created, some of these attributes are updated by RSCT peer domain and IBM Spectrum Scale as they try to open the device in the mode specified. ... | |
Problem Summary: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * Db2 pureScale user * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * See Error Description * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Upgrade to DB2 Version 11.5 FixPack 4 or later * **************************************************************** | |
Local Fix: | |
Use tb_break tool to check CM tiebreaker for purescale per the following link. * tb_break tool to check CM tiebreaker for purescale https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/tbbreak-tool-check-cm-tiebreak er-purescale | |
Solution | |
Workaround | |
not known / see Local fix | |
Timestamps | |
Date - problem reported : Date - problem closed : Date - last modified : | 24.11.2019 30.06.2020 30.06.2020 |
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) | |
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) |