|
Problem IT41351
|
Status: Closed |
HASH JOINS REQUIRING OVERFLOW NOW FAILING WITH -208
|
| product: |
INFORMIX SERVER / 5725A3900 / E10 - |
| Problem description: |
After upgrade to 14.10.xC4W1 (or 12.10.xC14) and newer, hash
joins that so far ran well can now fail with error -208.
Trapping the error would show the join in following stack:
afstack
afhandler
affail_interface
check_traperror
sqerr
ha_insrt_hashtab_or_ovrfl_page
hjoin_open
producer_thread
startup
With hash joins so far relying on PSORT_DBTEMP setting, this
might appear as though PSORT_DBTEMP didn't work any more - which
is true only indirectly. |
| Problem Summary: |
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED: *
* Users of Informix Server 12.10.xC14+ and 14.10.xC4W1+. *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: *
* See Error Description *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION: *
* Upgrade to Informix Server 12.10.xC16 (if available) or *
* 14.10.xC9. *
**************************************************************** |
| Local Fix: |
Turn on (add) flag 0x10000000 in onconfig SQL_DEF_CTRL parameter
to get back the old behavior (first determine its current value
using 'onstat -g cfg SQ_DEF_CTRL). |
| Solution |
|
| Workaround |
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED: *
* Users of Informix Server 12.10.xC14+ and 14.10.xC4W1+. *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: *
* See Error Description *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION: *
* Upgrade to Informix Server 12.10.xC16 (if available) or *
* 14.10.xC9. *
**************************************************************** |
| Comment |
Fixed in Informix Server 12.10.xC16 and 14.10.xC9. |
| Timestamps |
Date - problem reported :
Date - problem closed :
Date - last modified :
| 28.06.2022
04.10.2022
04.10.2022 |
| Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) |
|
| Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) |
